Became both easier and harder to detect. Todays propaganda is cleverly disguised. And you know something is wrong when the spokeswoman of the establishment Trump team claims her team gave facts. How bad are things once the MSM is the one to fix someone about the definition of the word fact, lies and truth! –
Became both easier and harder to detect. Todays propaganda is cleverly disguised. And you know something is wrong when the spokeswoman of the establishment Trump team claims her team gave facts. How bad are things once the MSM is the one to fix someone about the definition of the word fact, lies and truth! – That is part 3 of a series.
Here are 10 pieces of propaganda society which get bandied around with no contested and which fool people. Modern Day Propaganda at Society – 1. Russia hacked the US 2016 election. This one smelt right out from the gate. Many in the media have seen during the propaganda for very long time. The rumor has escalated a lengthy time, probably in order for its Deep State to blackmail Trump and hold something so he’ll do their bidding, even as he did by shooting 59 tomahawk missiles to Iraq, or no sorry, Syria it might be so difficult to recall which country we’re bombing, especially when eating tasty chocolate cake.
Trump admitted that him was hanging over affecting his capability to do his job. The narrative is propaganda for quite a few reasons. Putin has stated that suits operate The US, not the puppet president, therefore it matters. Usually the people screaming out the charges are actually the guilty ones attempting to deflect attention away from their very own crimes, put your finger on its map and try to locate a place where the US hasn’t interfered in another nations elections.
Now, thanks to fantastic independent journalism by Project Veritas, we’ve video footage of CNN supervisor producer John Bonifield admitting which the Russian hacker narrative is bullshit, that they’ve no real proof and which it was done purely to garner higher ratings. The right and left parties on its political spectrum offer real diversity and choice. Blatantly untrue. Theres no choice once its candidates all stand together on its really important issues, like who determines its creation and issuance of cash, how much control its Government gets over its men and women and how much secrecy the state allows itself to shroud its advanced black military projects. Candidates which challenge its establishment in truly radical ways like these, and which shake the foundation by questioning its main constructs, are sidelined and not all should go further. The debate is kept inside a controlled, manageable spectrum that is acceptable to its NWO conspirators, but which, frustratingly, implies that real change will never occur.